|| So long, and thanks for all the seats
||Jan. 8th, 2006 12:17 am|
We lost a fine, strong leader in Kennedy today; his parting email to the party reflected the dignity, political drive and consideration that he continues to stand for. I am disappointed that he had to go like this and feel that it reflects badly on many of his colleagues, and will consider my vote in the upcoming leadership election (that being my understanding of the Lib Dem's internal system) as probably the most important yet cast; one that will help determine whether our democracy becomes a truly multi-party system or reverts to its previous tennis-match status.|
But for now, Charles, thank you for your remarkable and ongoing contribution to both party and country.
(PS: and particular thanks for Not Being George Galloway)
I think I'm going to have to write to Lembit Opik and urge him to stand, because if the choice is going to be Menzies Campbell, Simon Hughes and Mark Oaten or some sub-set thereof, I'm going to be looking for the RON option as my first choice. I really don't want to vote for anyone who's in any way contributed to Kennedy's going.
Lembit is a great guy and if he were my MP I'd be most pleased to vote for him. However, his chances of becoming leader at this point are about those of Boris Johnson leading the Tories. Check the voting record — despite being a vocal fan of Kennedy, Öpik counts as a LibDem rebel, voting against them about 2/3 of the time; he concentrates very much on being a constituency MP, which is how he gets 60% of the vote (and gets away with voting against them 2/3 of the time).
He seems to be putting his weight behind Mark Oaten now, which is irritating given that Oaten seems to have been guilty of a lot of the behaviour he was ranting against just the other day in getting rid of Kennedy. I really want to be able to vote for someone who has either supported Kennedy or at least remained neutral.
I don't know whether Lembit would want to take it on at the moment - he had a rough year last year, with his brother dying and all.
*nod* That did occur to me when I was discussing it with djm4
the other day.
I think two mistakes have been made:
1) Someone not giving an honest run off against Charles K.
2) Charles K not resigning in the first place for health reasons (sorry, but I don't think politically and personally, an active alcoholic, with or without medical help should be trying to get elected as the leader of the country, Churchill not withstanding).
I have a lot of respect from Charles and his stance. He can now hand the banner on to someone to run without. I suspect it won't be Simon Hughes, but Menzies Campbell.
Interesting times, as the party can use this as an oppurtunity to really sell itself and what it stands for, just as the Tories has with their election run off.